Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_4.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:06:44
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.4214 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.3891 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.6814 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6168 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6045 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.5729 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   4.9326 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   2.8231 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.1070 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.7530 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.5833 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.4558 minutes

ans =

    12

GGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.49, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.06, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.59, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AACU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -7.22, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.77, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
ACGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.88, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.61, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.36, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -2.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.34, deficit  1.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.03, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.20, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUCGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GAAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
AGACU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUCCU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.34, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
ACCCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.16, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUCAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.84, deficit  0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUCAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -3.00, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.85, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
AGGUU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.01, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GGUUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.71, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.28, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUCAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -2.79, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.13, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GAUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.45, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUCGA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.13, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.91, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAUUU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56387.1,  5 NTs,                 AUUUU,score      -6.12, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55                 
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
ACGUU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -9.30, deficit  6.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -2.96, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAUUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.93, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GCCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -5.51, deficit -1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UGGACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -6.90, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GUAAGC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.29, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
GGUUAC 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CACCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.69, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGACUA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score      -6.37, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UACCGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -6.61, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.93, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GCGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
AGCGAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.44, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.67, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGGGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.29, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUACGA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -7.09, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GGUUGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -5.78, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GGCGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -7.62, deficit  3.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGCAAA 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.06, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.69, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAACC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.85, deficit  6.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.26, deficit -0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCACGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.80, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGGCGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.62, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.22, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UGAUAA 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.21, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCCUUG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score     -14.13, deficit 12.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  -0.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UAUAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CAUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit  0.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GCAUGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68478.1,  4 NTs,                GCUUGC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
UCCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -8.29, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.16, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CCAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.45, deficit  7.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
UGAAAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.26, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGAUC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AACCUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.96, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GACAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -8.19, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -3.06, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GUGGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.73, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUGCUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.72, deficit  0.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GAAGCC 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.41, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.37, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUAGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.14, deficit  1.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UCUAGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score     -10.41, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CUCCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.59, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGACCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -12.35, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -9.28, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGAGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.29, deficit  2.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAACAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUUAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -6.11, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGGAAGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.36, deficit  2.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GCGAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.88, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
UGAAAUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -6.04, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CGAUGAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.74, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCUUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.15, deficit  2.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CCUAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGGAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_77081.1,  5 NTs,               UGAAAAG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35             
UGAUGGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.12, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GCUAGGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.18, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
GGUAAAC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
UUCGUAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -8.90, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -7.32, deficit  3.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GCAAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.20, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUCUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -8.95, deficit  5.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGUCUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.71, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CAGCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.70, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CGGGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UCGAAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UACCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51033.1,  6 NTs,                GGUCUC,score     -11.39, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.26, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUUCCUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -5.18, deficit -0.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GUUGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.75, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
UUAAAUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGGUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -6.85, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CAUGAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUAUUAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.71, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGUUGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.20, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
CCAUCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -6.99, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGCUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.25, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UGAAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -8.50, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.68, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGUACUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -6.42, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGUGGUA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.34, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CCCGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.54, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GAAGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.53, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUAUUCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UGAACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.34, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CCAUGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CAAAGAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.29, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GGGGAAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.53, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CCCGUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score     -10.98, deficit  5.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
UGAUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -8.23, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUUCUAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.19, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.52, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
AAGAUUAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.50, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.24, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
CUUCCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.88, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GAGAAGGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.73, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.61, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGACGGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAACAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.78, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
CCAACAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.46, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAGUGCCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GAGAAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -10.73, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGGACUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.68, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGUAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.87, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GCUGGUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AUAGUUAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.35, deficit  1.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GAAUCCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CUGCCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.03, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.42, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GAAGAUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.86, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UACUGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CUUGUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -11.11, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GAAAAAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.35, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGCGAACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.47, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CAGUCUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -7.64, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GGGGAGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.83, deficit  4.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGUUCAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.62, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AAAAUUCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -9.55, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UCAUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -11.22, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.22, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  72.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGACAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -9.77, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGGUUGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.61, deficit  4.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AAUCGAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score      -8.55, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCUGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GUCGCAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCGAUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -6.51, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUCAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.88, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUUCCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GGGAUUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -8.81, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGUGGUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.44, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GUUUUUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_33612.1,  6 NTs,               CUUUUGG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55                 
GUGGAACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -5.85, deficit  1.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.97, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AAGUGAGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.40, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UUAAGAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.24, deficit  1.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCGGAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -11.54, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CGUCCCAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.10, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGACAUUCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score      -9.73, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUUGCAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37694.1,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAAUC,score      -5.96, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35   
GGGGAAGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -9.21, deficit  3.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
UUCUCAGAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.38, deficit  2.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUUUCUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.60, deficit  2.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.40, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GAACUGACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
AGCUCCCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.19, deficit  7.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGCGGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  6.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GGAAUAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.57, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGAGAACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.23, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAAAUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.08, deficit  2.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAAGAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.06, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGGGACAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -12.61, deficit  4.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.92, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGGGUGUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCGGUGUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.96, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GAGGAAAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CCUGUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -10.44, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUUGGACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGCUGUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.13, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GGACAGACC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAGAGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.81, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUUUCAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -9.84, deficit  5.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
CUCAUCGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score      -8.85, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
GUUAAUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.78, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUCAAGACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.34, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAGGAGAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.03, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGCGUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.55, deficit  3.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CGCCAUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGGCUUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.48, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAUAAAAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAAAAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.45, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
AUCUUAGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -9.25, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.78, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUCUGUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.59, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGAAAUUGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -6.59, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUACUUGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.61, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CCGAUUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.87, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GUCGUGUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -12.45, deficit  8.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.76, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
GAACACAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.64, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
AGCAAAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score      -7.81, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GGUCUUCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score     -10.62, deficit  4.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GCGUCCAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -9.32, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GGCGCAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score     -12.32, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAAAAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.06, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGUUAUUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.50, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CAAUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -8.97, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CGGAAUGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.09, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UGCUUCUUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.80, deficit  6.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAAAACGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.17, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGUCUUGAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.08, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAGGUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.93, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AUACAACUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.91, deficit  6.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUAUGACUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CUUUAAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.64, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AGAAAAAGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -13.71, deficit  6.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCGGAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -15.28, deficit  7.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUACAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.09, deficit  6.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAUUAAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.45, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGGUUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.43, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUCACUAGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -9.57, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GAGCGAUUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -14.13, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GUUCAAGAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score      -8.30, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CGGUUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.83, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGACGGCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.34, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CGCUCGAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.39, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
CGAUUUUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.66, deficit  5.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGCUUGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.63, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GAGAUGCCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.97, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
UUGCUGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.60, deficit  7.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.31, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
AGAUGGAAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.63, deficit  1.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUGUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.95, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GUGAAUUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.79, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CGCUGAUGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.94, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUAAGAGUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.54, deficit  5.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.29, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGAAUUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.21, deficit  4.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUCCGAAGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score      -9.38, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CAAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.20, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGACGUGACU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -13.66, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGGAAAGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.10, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GAUGUCCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.13, deficit  8.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUUGGUCCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.96, deficit  8.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUGUUGAAUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -11.85, deficit  4.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CCGGCUCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GUGAGAUAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.68, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAUGAGAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.03, deficit  8.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CAACUCGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.08, deficit  1.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CUCAAAUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.81, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAUUGGUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.02, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GUACGCUCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -13.50, deficit  5.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGUCGGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_15968.1,  8 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -8.12, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F               
CAUUCCCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.66, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGUGUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.70, deficit  5.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CUGAAUUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.77, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
UAAAGUACAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -11.71, deficit  4.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
UGCGCAUCUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.65, deficit  6.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GGAGCGUAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.21, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GAAAGAGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
UAAGCUAUCAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.39, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
AUCUGAGAGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -15.07, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUUUGAAUUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UUGAUUCAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUGUAACUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.28, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.14, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAAUUGACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGCCUCCAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.53, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGACCGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -15.33, deficit  7.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CUGGGCUUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUUAAAGGUAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.54, deficit  6.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGUGAACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -16.21, deficit  8.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAGAUCGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.55, deficit  7.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUCUUCAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.64, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGUCGGUCGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.17, deficit  4.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
UUCUAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -10.87, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUGACGGUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.44, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
AUCCAACCUCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.95, deficit 10.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.69, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
UUGAUCAGGGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.83, deficit  8.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.55, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAAAGCUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.03, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUGAUCUCCUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GGAAGAAGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.89, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCUGAGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.25, deficit  6.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUAUGCCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CAACAGACUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -15.48, deficit  5.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAUCUGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.92, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUCGCUCAGCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.19, deficit 10.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GUAACGAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GAAUAAUCGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -13.92, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
CUUUAAGUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GAAAUAUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GAAUUUUAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score      -9.80, deficit -0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CUUCAGAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.65, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAACUAAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.36, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUUCUGGGAAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.49, deficit  3.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CUGAAUCUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.43, deficit  6.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAAUAUUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -10.41, deficit  0.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.44, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUACCAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.57, deficit  8.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
ACUACUUGCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.59, deficit  7.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GAUGCUUCUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.37, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCGUUGUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -16.21, deficit  9.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGUCACCAGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70505.1, 11 NTs,          GAUCAGCCAUGC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35
CUGCCCAUAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.27, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGACCGCAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.02, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGCAGUAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGAAAAGGCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.14, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAUUGGAACCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.93, deficit  5.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
CAUUUUUGGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.05, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGGGUAGAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.31, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACAUAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
AAAUGACGAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.93, deficit  8.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAGAGUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.12, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGGUUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.36, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGAAUUUAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  3.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGAGAAUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -16.54, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGACGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -19.01, deficit  8.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.02, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
UGUGAAAAUCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.80, deficit  6.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.01, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
UGUCGUAACGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -15.54, deficit  8.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CGAUUCACGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -17.26, deficit  9.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAGCUUUGGUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -16.35, deficit 10.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
GAUUGGUUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -13.40, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
UGCUCAAUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -13.32, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.54, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GUUGAUACUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -16.30, deficit  9.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGACGACUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.24, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CUAGGUAAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.48, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.81, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAAGAGAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.41, deficit  8.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCAAAAGGUAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -10.44, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUAAACAACUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -12.34, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.71, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GUGACAGCGCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.83, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.99, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGCAAAACAAUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.17, deficit  8.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGAAAGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.13, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GGAGUUGGUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.48, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.98, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GGAAAAGUAUAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -18.09, deficit 10.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.49, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGGGUAGGCAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -16.85, deficit  9.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
CUAUAGAGUUGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -15.72, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.32, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGCACGCGAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -16.39, deficit  7.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
AGAAAUUAGGCAGUCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -17.76, deficit  8.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGCAUAGGACCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12710.1, 15 NTs,      GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC,score     -15.17, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAAGAAGGAAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90257.1, 15 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.80, deficit  6.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.23, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 85.0000	 71.0000	4
5	100.0000	 88.5000	 50.5000	23
6	100.0000	 87.0000	 49.5000	60
7	 99.5000	 48.0000	 14.5000	51
8	 99.0000	 29.0000	  5.0000	46
9	 99.5000	 15.5000	  1.5000	68
10	 96.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000	41
11	 88.5000	  5.0000	  0.0000	42
12	 44.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	23
13	 17.0000	  0.5000	  0.0000	12
14	  8.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  1.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.5000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  11 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  30 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  34 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 224 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 272 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 300 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 374 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.6875%
Number of models giving false positives is 290 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.00
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.35
